Saturday , November 23 2024

Klijnsma promises Senate social minimum action plan

Dutch State Secretary of Social Affairs and Labour Jetta Klijnsma has partly given in to the wish of the First Chamber of the Dutch Parliament to look at setting a social minimum for Bonaire, St. Eustatius and Saba that is based on the benchmarks of the basic cost of living.

Klijnsma promised in a meeting with the First Chamber’s Permanent Committee for Kingdom Relations on Tuesday that she would draft an action plan to establish a social minimum for the Caribbean Netherlands that is based on the objective benchmarks of the basic cost of living. The action would be ready before March 2017. In the meantime, she would keep striving for a higher minimum wage and the implementation of the poverty policy.

The First Chamber’s Permanent Committee for Kingdom Relations met with Minister Ronald Plasterk and State Secretary Jetta Klijnsma on Tuesday to discuss the implementation of the Senate’s motion to set a social minimum for the Caribbean Netherlands. (Suzanne Koelega photo)
The First Chamber’s Permanent Committee for Kingdom Relations met with Minister Ronald Plasterk and State Secretary Jetta Klijnsma on Tuesday to discuss the implementation of the Senate’s motion to set a social minimum for the Caribbean Netherlands. (Suzanne Koelega photo)

Klijnsma as well as Dutch Minister of Home Affairs and Kingdom Relations Ronald Plasterk were called to a meeting with the Senate to discuss the execution of the motion of Senator Ruard Ganzevoort of the green left party Groen- Links.

This motion, which was co-signed by ten other parties in the Senate and adopted almost unanimously in June this year, requested the Dutch Government to establish a social minimum that is based on the benchmarks of the basic cost of living for the Caribbean Netherlands.

The fact that this is done in the Netherlands, but that the Dutch Government so far has not done so for Bonaire, St. Eustatius and Saba has been a source of concern in the Senate where all parties, with the exception of the Party for Freedom PVV, have been clamouring for commitment of the Dutch Government to achieve an acceptable provisions level and to raise the standard of living.

The Senate has objected to the policy of the Dutch Government to base the social security on the legal minimum wage on the islands without establishing the social minimum. “Government opts for a different method by basing the social minimum on the minimum wage instead of basing the social minimum on the basic cost of living. We are not having two different definitions within the Netherlands,” said Senator Ganzevoort on Tuesday.

Ganzevoort questioned the reluctance of the Dutch Government to establish a social minimum and said that the Senate needed a clear answer about the calculation of the social minimum, which would also assist in establishing an adequate poverty policy.

According to Ganzevoort, Government’s policy to combat poverty made little sense if it hadn’t been established what the basic needs of the people on the islands are. “We need to define the social minimum first before we can talk about social security and poverty policy.”

Senator Helmi Huijbregts- Schiedon of the liberal democratic VVD party agreed. She said it was important to establish a point of departure, meaning a social minimum, which was linked to the basic cost of living. “That relates to the success of the poverty policy.”

Senator Meta Meijer of the Socialist Party (SP) said it was vital that the people on the islands were able to sustain themselves. She pointed out that it was simply impossible to lead a decent life, and to pay rent, cover the utilities and food bills off the social welfare.

Meijer said that in a consumers study the figures of the basic cost of living had already been accurately defined and urged the State Secretary to take the necessary steps to set a social minimum. “When will this matter finally be arranged so people can live a decent life?”

Senator Peter Ester of the ChristianUnion agreed with his colleagues that it was important to establish the social minimum, but he did question why it was so complicated, as the Dutch Government maintained, to define the objective criteria of the basic cost of living. He said that this showed that the know-how infrastructure was not up to par on the islands, and that in the Netherlands this would not have been acceptable.

Senator André Postma of the Labour Party PvdA said the order in which to do things in the context of a broader social agenda was important. He said the final figure of the basic cost of living should be the first step, based on which the social minimum should be established. He asked Klijnsma to lay the foundation.

State Secretary Klijnsma said that the subsistence minimum was not only a topic in the Senate, but also in the talks with the public entities. The first conference on establishing an integral social policy for the islands was held in Saba last month. Klijnsma said this meeting was “constructive” and that hopefully similar conferences would be held in Bonaire and St. Eustatius in January 2017.

According to Klijnsma, the social partners on the islands also have a responsibility to pay the employees a decent salary with which they can sustain themselves. St. Eustatius and Saba have a higher minimum wage, and another, considerable increase will be implemented per January 1, 2017. Bonaire, she added, could respond a bit more enthusiastically where it concerned the increase of the minimum wage. She said it was important to keep motivating the social partners to increase the minimum wage.

Besides a higher minimum wage and the subsequent increase of the social welfare, the Dutch Government was also committed to combat poverty on the islands. The child benefit (“kinderbijslag”) has been introduced and aside from the 600,000 euros that is structurally budgeted to combat poverty, the Dutch Government has made additional funds available to the tune of one million euros.

“I want to do everything possible to lend an extra hand to people who are facing hardship,” said Klijnsma. She explained that through the special allowances, it was also possible to assist people with the purchase of necessary items such as a fan, a bed or new fridge. “We can provide concrete, practical assistance.”

Minister Plasterk addressed the issue of poverty. He said that together with the Island Governments, the Dutch Government looked at the best way to combat poverty. He said that a lot was done in this area by also investing in education, healthcare and the physical infrastructure. “The combating of poverty is more than higher social welfare.”

Plasterk acknowledged that the cost of living, the price of groceries was very high on the islands, and that ways of reducing these expenses was being looked at. In his opinion, the islands could do more in the agricultural sector by growing their own food. He commended the agricultural projects in St. Eustatius and Saba.

The Daily Herald.

Baldauf Wins Saba Day’s Sea to Scenery Race
Results from Saba Day Wahoo contest 2016

One comment

  1. In my last discourse on matterS related to the visit of the dutch kingdom representative, Gilbert Isabella , I ended by stating purposefully, that the Dutch needed I quote” not only to do the right thing, but do the right thing right”. It surely must be victorious news to the Island councils and constituents of the small islands to be greeted by positive discussions,positions,argued,supported by ten parties in Senate for agreement by the First Chamber Committee.
    The opposing argument for what I term ” Fixed social allowances without justifiable cost of living factors” as instituted by the Dutch was professionally advocated by Senate members,in a manner which illustrated the importance of social justice in determing political issues. The formula, if ever there was one,by the Dutch for determination of a social minimum wage for the Public Entities of the Dutch Caribbean,without first considering cost of living factors was wrong.It needed to be set against the basket of basic goods and services.
    The point of 10-10-10 which placed these islands as Dutch Entities,meant that they were socially/economically measured with even those in Holland.
    I believe,to use such a measure was not justified,considering the factors, that peoples of the islands practice different cultures,associated through socialization,employment and customs within a greater global Caribbean region.Probably the time has emerged for closer integrated official talks between these Dutch islands and those of the Caricom region.
    It is somewhat interesting to hear the rational to support a conversation seeking for retroactive allowance payment for the islands,particularly since it has been over one year that islanders have had to survive amidst high inflation rates of -0.5 recorded in 2015 and ever rising cost of living.